That was the craziest market session that I've ever experienced. I traded earlier in the session and was about to short, but decided to wait for some more confirmation. The market then fell off a cliff. I calculated that if I had taken that short (and executed everything perfectly), I could have made a year's worth of income in a couple of minutes.
I'm actually kind of glad I wasn't part of the insanity. It looks like folks on both sides took a pretty good pounding. My order matrix looked like it had accelerated 100 times. Crazy times.
My long gap fade this morning failed miserably. After I stopped out, I noticed some areas of resistance around the highs yesterday. Interesting. Maybe this rally is done. Who knows, but Adam Hewison has an interesting video about where we sit right now in the market. Here's what he Adam says:
"We owe trillions of dollars, but Crude oil is at $86 a barrel, the DOW, S&P, and NASDAQ are making new highs almost everyday and unemployment is officially at 9.7%.
Everything is great! Happy days are here again... Right?
So is the DOW, S&P, and NASDAQ all going to keep going higher forever? Or are the teachings of a dead mathematician going to reverse this juggernaut of a market?"
Adam Hewison has posted an interesting video on where he thinks the market is headed based on his study of the technical charts. He writes:
"To many technicians, it is very clear where the equity markets will reverse, and for those folks who don't follow the technicals, this is a key reversal area in the S&P 500, the NASDAQ, and the Dow."
"Currently the major trend remains positive for all the indices and we would only become negative on the these markets should the key levels I show you today, are broken."
You can see Adam's video here.
I wanted to point out the power that Fibonacci grids exert on the market by drawing a grid from Friday's lows and highs.
Fibonacci grids are not magic and they don't have some sort of hidden "power" over prices because of some mysterious use of number sequences. They work because patterns in the market continually repeat themselves over and over again. And they work because there are a lot of people (like me) who trade using Fibonacci grids.
I wanted to point out using a 5 minute chart of SPY how the action last week can effect price action this week. You'll notice that today's prices bounced around in Friday's range and often bounced off exact grid retracements (blue arrows). With knowledge that these areas will provide support and resistance to price movement, you arm yourself with a very powerful "predictive" capability that many traders out there aren't aware (or capable) of.
Yesterday's action on SPY gave us some really good examples of how you can spend a few seconds drawing Fibonacci grids to give you an edge in figuring out where to enter a trade, where to place a stop, and where to exit your trade. There are entire books written about entries, exits and stop placement and most traders really struggle with all three causing psychological mistakes that diminish and even eliminate trading edges.
Fibonacci numbers aren't magic, but if used properly, they can give you the ability to avoid emotional pitfalls and help you make trading decisions that are based on data rather than feelings.
Let's go through yesterday's trade to see how drawing two Fibonacci grids could have have saved you racking your brain throughout a trade that lasted several minutes. This trade happened in the last hour of the trading day on January 26th.
On the first chart I've drawn a Fibonacci price retracement grid. There were a ton of reasons that this was a trade that was going to work. Price made a strong impulse down and then retraced to several moving averages which were all converging together creating a huge amount of resistance. It would have taken a lot for buyers to push price through that level. As price began its retracement, I drew the Fibonacci grid from the start of the impulse down to the end of the move.
A grid like this gives me an unemotional decision making tool. First I look for price to retrace to a Fibonacci number--preferably 50%. Next I look for indecision to appear in the form of a candle on the chart. A doji candle (the "cross" at the blue arrow) is often my trigger and one appeared and touched the 50% retracement. Next, I wait for price to run past the doji low (in this case) for my entry which happened in the next 5 minute candle. Notice there is no "freaking out" about the best entry--it's plotted for me on the chart.
Next I set my stop. Again, the Fibonacci grid does that for me. I know that if price breaks the 61.8% level that I was wrong about the trade and the odds of the trade continuing are greatly diminished. I placed my stop just beyond that level. Again, it's not based on a dollar amount or a "gut feel". I can see where the stop goes right on the chart.
Once the trade is triggered I spend another few seconds drawing a Fibonacci Price Extension. The price extension grid gives me my targets for the trade. I can choose whether I want to be aggressive or conservative in the targets I choose and the grid lays them out for me.
Notice in yesterday's action how price reacted to the different levels in the grid. I've highlighted them with blue arrows. Noticed how price paused at each level in the grid and then crashed through. You could have conservatively targeted the 61.8% level or gotten a little more aggressive at the 100% level (notice the pause there), or even gotten real aggressive and targeted the next two levels.
So, instead of racking your brain trying to manage this trade after you took it, you could just calmly draw a grid and place an order at the level that you feel comfortable with.
This is just one example of trades that are happening every day. Of course not every Fibonacci grid is going to work out this perfectly, but enough of them do to give you a distinct edge in your trading with emotionless entries, stops and targets.
I was too wimpy to take a trade this morning that had really good odds of succeeding. $113.00 has been serving as support for SPY for the last couple of weeks, and I knew a break beneath it would result in a lot of people who are long the market getting stopped out.
But I still struggled taking the trade. I should have had an order already in and I was preparing to create one when price broke through $113.00. I tried several times to put in a limit order with no luck. Finally, my order triggered. When it did, I was more than $1,000 away from a decent stop. I started second guessing my trade and finally just quit the trade with a tepid $60 gain.
It's frustrating when you have an easy $1,000 (or more) and turn it into a small win or worse--a big loss.
I saw an great Elliot Wave developing on the one minute chart, and I still was too wimpy to get back in and instead took a simulated trade. Of course I made lots of money on that one.
We'll have to see if today develops into a decent trend day. It looks like we've got good odds of that happening.
Cause and Effect:
Thinking Differently for Traders and Investors
by
D.R. Barton, Jr.
When I was training to be a chemical engineer, decision making was quite “black and white”: Learn the rules of the physical world and then apply them. Learn how molecules combine and separate. Learn how mass and energy get transferred from place to place. Learn what is economical and what is not. And lastly, study hard and get good grades.
Once I was out and practicing engineering in the real world, things weren’t always so cut and dried. Outside influences often complicated things. The world of “black and white” became a world with many shades of grey. In a pristine lab environment (like back at school), molecules always combined the same way. But in the real world, contaminants could get in the system and reduce yields or create new and undesirable products altogether.
Equipment that was rated at “x” horsepower would always seem to run a little less efficiently because some field condition (normal wear, extra bends and turns, fluctuating temperature and humidity) would strip away efficiency.
In the end, the best engineers in the real world of processing plants were those who could deal most effectively with problems and conditions not found in the text book. And it will come as no surprise to most that raw intelligence was not directly correlated to success on the floor of a chemical plant. The best engineers had a certain savviness or what my Dad would call “horse sense” about the best engineers.
And I have found a very similar quality in the best traders and investors that I’ve gotten to know. They don’t have to be the most book-smart folks (though a few are), but they have a certain grounded grasp of the big picture that allows them to adapt, correct and continue with self-assured ease.
This group of characteristics that turns the average thinker into someone with good common sense or “street smarts” is somewhat difficult to sum up in a few sentences. But let’s look at some of these concepts or decision making loops that may be most easily modeled.
Trading Is Not Engineering or Accounting
Before we jump into some key decision making characteristics, let’s be clear on the differences between the learning paths for trading and the path for traditional knowledge-based professions like engineering, accounting or medicine.
I’ve often heard professional traders lament that those desiring to learn their craft see a few mouse clicks and some fairly elementary math and assume that they, too, can be consistently successful traders and investors in matter of days or weeks. Some pro traders will respond to this sentiment with a saying like, “A highly paid doctor or lawyer had to study for years before getting compensated handsomely. Who would expect to get paid like me after studying just a couple of weeks or months?”
And while part of that thought process is correct (the fact that there are knowledge based aspects to both trading and accounting), there is also a major fallacy in the argument.
Acquiring and demonstrating minimal proficiency in the basic knowledge set needed for engineering or accounting or law or medicine will lead to a well-paid position for the vast majority of participants. Not so for traders.
The learning path for a trader is more like that of a professional poker player. Demonstrating knowledge and proficiency in the basic skills only gets you a seat at the table, it doesn’t assure you of an income. While the poker-trading analogy isn’t perfect, their paths of progression are much more related than that of an doctor or an engineer and a trader.
Let’s look at one key area that makes trading very different from doctoring or engineering: the search for certainty or “What happens when you do everything right and it still turns out wrong?”
Doctors, engineers and indeed most professions live in a cause and effect world. If you do A, then a very high percentage of the time B will follow. There are notable exceptions, when a treatment doesn’t work or a product line gets contaminated, but by and large if you do the correct action, you get the correct result.
Trading is quite different. A trader can have the perfect set-up and entry, execute everything perfectly and still have the trade result in a loss. While traders lose money in this situation, that’s a problem perhaps but probably not the biggest problem. The largest problem for most people is the mental disconnect between cause (doing everything right) and effect (losing money). That result conflicts with their classical education which does not equip them with the tool set required for managing uncertain outcomes.
If we do things exactly right and still only get the desired result 60% of the time (or 50% or even 40% in long term trend following systems), traditional cause-and-effect thinking can easily make damaging conclusions. Since cause and effect seem only causally (no pun intended) related...
The rules really aren’t good and don’t serve me.
I no longer need to follow my rules exactly. (or at all)
I can tweak the rules so I am in better control (or at least feel like I’m in control)
When a trade or group of trades doesn’t come out well, our typical human reaction to solve a problem kicks in. Almost all traders and investors tweak their systems and strategies prematurely, based on too little data (too small of a sample size). So many people have been trained in an education system that teaches us to solve a problem if we don’t get the desired outcome with pure cause and effect thinking. Dealing with highly complex systems with great levels of uncertainty is just not in most people’s basic educational background or experience.
So what?
The good news is that cause-and-effect thinking works in most areas of our personal and professional life. And it is deeply rooted in our need to be right. It does not, however, serve traders well.
A useful solution to overcome our mental “cause and effect” disconnect is simple to describe, but it’s very difficult to adopt for the long term: broaden your view of trading results. We must allow our trading and investing strategies to play out long enough to reach their expected profitability. Fretting and wringing your hands over the results of every trade is not very useful and can lead to premature judgments and tweaking.
Each trade should be evaluated ONLY in terms of whether or not we followed our trading rules without regard for the dollars and cents results. Reset your cause and effect decision process only after you have a group of 30 or 50 trades (or an even higher number if you trade more frequently). Then you can evaluate cause and effect on a statistically valid data set, not on any one trade or group of trades that have so many more outside influences than one can ever hope to control.
Reviewing only large data sets creates a discipline that serves several purposes:
It reduces stress by telling our mind that no single trade matters very much, as long as we follow our rules.
It reduces the variability of results over time because we’re only adjusting our system or strategy after an appropriate interval of time.
It greatly increases the chances of profitability because we do fewer of the systematic things that cause losses.
No one trade is important (as long as you always respect your stop loss)—it is just a useful data point as part of the larger whole. Allow yourself and your strategy the luxury of time. And don’t be surprised if lower stress and greater profitability follow close behind.
Great Trading,
D. R.
About D.R. Barton, Jr.: A passion for the systematic approach to the markets and lifelong love of teaching and learning have propelled D.R. Barton, Jr. to the top of the investment and trading arena. He is a regularly featured guest on both Report on Business TV, and WTOP News Radio in Washington, D.C., and has been a guest on Bloomberg Radio. His articles have appeared on SmartMoney.com and Financial Advisor magazine. You may contact D.R. at "drbarton" at "iitm.com".
Posts
All Comments
